The Shaft | Mar. 29 11:39 pm EST
ADVICE

THE LOTTERY: Everything you ever wanted to know about what your lottery number means, and more! (UPDATED)

NOTE: We don’t want to keep you waiting all night, so we’re going to start rolling this out piece by piece, starting from the top: 30 and 20-point info all here, with the final portion to come soon. (Last update: 1:30 a.m.) 2:20 a.m.: It’s all here now—have at it.

Hello again, fellow Columbians, and welcome back to The Shaft’s 2010 lottery breakdown. Housing’s list is public as of this morning, and we’ve been tallying, analyzing, and crunching numbers all day.

As always, we’ll do our best to answer all questions in the comments. And if you think we’ve made a mistake, please tell us—it’s quite possible we slipped up somewhere. Anyway, it’s all here, after the jump.

Before we begin, a very important note regarding confusion on the list of lottery numbers. Unlike last year, Housing hasn’t yet listed which groups are in for EC Exclusion suites (ECX) separately from regular suites (important because these pick after all 30-point groups as well as senior regroup, regardless of the point value the ECX group has—for example, 30/1500 all seniors picks before 30/500 ECX). We’re working on getting this information, but at the moment, projections for five-person suites are a little bit murky because we have no way of knowing which five-person groups are standard and which are ECX.

Another note: Earlier today (and several other times throughout the day—thanks, readers!), we received a link to a Housing calculator, kindly built by computer whiz Blake Arnold, CC SEAS ’11 (and, full disclosure—a suitemate of mine!). After reports of errors surfaced, though, we elected to hold it until we’d run the numbers ourselves. Appears the kinks have been worked out. Here’s the link—definitely worth checking out.

30-point groups

Six-person groups: There are a scarily large number of these—47, to be precise. There are seven EC six-person high rises and 40 EC six-person townhouses, but a few are lost to RAs, and a few more are lost to special interest housing. It’s possible that one of the very top groups will drop to general selection to snag the Watt studio singles, but probably the cutoff here for everything EC sixes is around 2500. Groups below that, don’t despair yet—it’s possible that some of the groups in the 2000-2500 range will elect to drop to Senior Regroup rather than take one of the dozen six-person townhouses that have one double. The others will have to settle for the new six-person suites in Ruggles (with two doubles) or the one suite in Claremont, or drop to Regroup.

Five-person groups: As we said, still in the dark a little bit here. There are 54 groups, but we don’t know how many of those are ECX. There are seven EC all-single high rises and 10 fives in Hogan—those are the choice options, and will probably both be gone between 30/1000 and 30/1500. After that, we could see as many as 37 of the 56 ECX suites fall to 30-point groups—more if other seniors regroup to get them, less if all-senior groups don’t want to take a double and instead regroup toward something else. We’ll update this as soon as we have an updated list.

Four-person groups: 58 of these, which is a rather terrifying prospect. Six available in Claremont, 10 in EC (though a few gone to RAs), 16 in Hogan (with a few to RAs, again), eight in Ruggles (a few to RAs, once more). So probably half of these groups are actually going to get four-person suites. EC/Ruggles/Hogan should be gone by 30/1200 or so. Claremont will probably drop some, but anyone in the back half of the 30-point draw here should get ready for Regroup.

Three-person groups:
Eight of these, which should get everyone into either a Claremont three or a partial suite with an RA in Hogan, Ruggles, or EC, which are likely the targets of groups with RA friends.

Two-person groups: 84 of these, it would appear. These will axe all 35 twos in EC, the 11 two-bedroom apartments in Watt, and most of the dozen one-bedroom Watt apartments, too. All the high-demand H, K, and C lines in Woodbridge should go, too, and some of the medium-demand lines. Which of these options goes where will depend, as it always does, on personal preference—all of the above have various pros and cons (except the two-bedrooms in Watt—those are gold, gone by 30/1000 at the absolute latest)—but even the worst off here can rest easy with either a Watt one-bedroom or a Woodbridge medium-demand line.

20-30 point groups

So, the in-betweens—combined junior-senior groups, mostly, and more ECX. NOT 30-point groups (see above) or 20-point groups (see below).

Five-person groups: 18 more of these in-between—probably all ECX (again, we can’t yet be sure). Now, if NO seniors regroup to take ECX suites, these groups could all snag them. Unfortunately for these folks, the chances of that occurring are somewhere south of zero. Our best guess for now: the 15 groups with 26.67 point values sneak into ECX suites, while any ECX group with a point value lower than that misses out and has to drop to General Selection.

Four-person groups: A bunch of these, and we can’t quite figure out why. Ruggles, EC, and Hogan will be long gone. It’s conceivable, with a stretch, that a Claremont suite might slip through. Beyond that, perhaps they have eyes on the groups that can fill up RA townhouses in EC? Hard to know. Slim pickings here, though.

Two-person groups:
Another nine of these—should snag any remaining Watt one-bedrooms and Woodbridge medium or low-demand suites. After Senior Regroup and this round, the prime Watt/Woodbridge leftovers will likely be next to nil for junior pairs.

20-point groups

Eight-person groups: All we can say here is wow. No fewer than 24 (!) groups of eight are in play, and there are only 14 suites available. Sorry juniors, but the days of an all-but-guaranteed spot in Ruggles with an eight-person group are long gone. (Advance prediction for next year: some juniors start luring seniors by offering up the singles in order to boost point values—we thought that might happen this year, but this might serve as a wake-up call.) One of the top groups might drop to General Selection, but the cutoff here should be with one of the three groups clustered around 20/2000. (It really is painful to see this—yours truly snuck in last year with a number that wouldn’t sniff Ruggles this time around. Our thoughts go out to rising juniors in this boat!)

Six-person groups: We applaud the gumption of the juniors gunning, presumably, for the new Ruggles six-person suites. With seven suites available and only five groups, seems like chances are reasonable. Desperate seniors might jump in, but we continue to find it hard to believe that groups of seniors would accept a suite with not one but two small doubles.

Two-person groups: It’s possible that a few Woodbridge suites from the low-demand lines slide through to the top few groups here, but don’t count on even that. Most, then, will turn to Watt studio doubles. Some will drop to General Selection, certainly, as old junior standbys such as McBain walk-throughs have been renovated out of existence. Some others to Nussbaum, and maybe some to Broadway.

The rest: Scattered fives and fours aren’t likely to have much luck (threes down here might still sneak into the RA suites they’re likely targeting, though)—again, maybe something in Claremont, by chance, or the odd five-person suite on the first floor of Ruggles.

Everybody else

Sophomores, down here, it is finally your turn.

Seven-person suites: Unfortunately, those 10 seven-person suites in Claremont that were once the domain of lucky all-sophomore groups this year likely won’t get to any. With 12 groups of seven before the 10-point round even starts, they’ll likely all be gone to groups that wisely pulled in juniors, unless some of those drop to General Selection.

Pairs, and anything else left: For 10-point groups, this is pretty much everybody else—any groups of eight or six or four are almost certainly using the Sophomore Pair-Up option, so they can be counted among the dozens of groups of two to pick here. Where do they go? In very rough order: Broadway, Nussbaum, Furnald, McBain, Schapiro, EC sixth floor, Harmony, Wien. But there really is no order there—all of these dorms have some rooms that are better than others, so to each his own. (Yours truly, again, bemoans the fact that McBain rooms are now virtually all the same—no more hidden gems there.) Just do yourselves a favor and look around at all the floor plans when you get into the housing cage to make sure you’re seeing all the options.

We really do feel for rising sophomores—it’s probably going to be slim pickings once it gets to that point. But fear not—just try to pick onto the same floor with a group of friends, and you’ll be fine. (And enjoy your last few weeks in Carman—you may never have it that good again.)

That is, in fact, a wrap. Thanks for reading—hope you enjoyed all this. We’ll have more the rest of this week on the lottery, appointment times, and everything else housing-related. Questions in the comments welcome—we’ll keep answering and updating.

COMMENTS (70)

  1. FINALLY • March 29, 2010 at 11:43 pm • Reply

    THANK YOU. Keep it coming!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. yes!! • March 29, 2010 at 11:50 pm • Reply

    do 10 points pleassseeee

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • i second • March 30, 2010 at 12:34 am • Reply

      this motion

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 2:24 am •

        All there now, though I have to be honest, I don’t envy you this year. Try to figure out a way to stay in Carman–everyone secretly wishes that was an option.

        VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Love this • March 29, 2010 at 11:51 pm • Reply

    I love this series. Spectrum is doing a great job!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Spectrum Slammer • March 30, 2010 at 12:04 am • Reply

      more like specDumb

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • that was so funny • March 30, 2010 at 11:06 am •

        I shit my pants

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. 30 pt in the 22 hundreds range • March 29, 2010 at 11:56 pm • Reply

    goodbye Hogan…

    Hello Spectrum, can you tell me of good off-campus housing websites?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. SO housing sucks • March 29, 2010 at 11:58 pm • Reply

    THANK YOU! So helpful

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. Housing sucks • March 30, 2010 at 12:03 am • Reply

    spectrum rocks! keep up the good work guys

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. Suite 8D • March 30, 2010 at 1:04 am • Reply

    278D 8D 8D 8D

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Lanette • January 24, 2012 at 5:36 am • Reply

      If you wrote an article about life we’d all reach enlihgtmennet.

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • yrzljwda • January 25, 2012 at 4:06 am • Reply

      3tuhMA glbjwutfiydt

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • nbswtlldsl • January 26, 2012 at 1:02 pm • Reply

      OEYiLL feobbhnohdvd

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. Suite 8D • March 30, 2010 at 1:05 am • Reply

    also, great coverage ben

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  9. question • March 30, 2010 at 2:23 am • Reply

    do RA’s get to pull in 5 people to a 6 person EC suite?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 2:29 am • Reply

      No. As of last year, RAs can only pull in one person as a rider. So a six-person EC suite with an RA and rider would have four open spots, into which a four-person group could pick. But a six-person suite with an RA is still one fewer option for six-person groups.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 2:30 am • Reply

      See here for more on RAs and riders:

      http://spectrum.columbiaspectator.com/the-shaft/ras-riders-look-out

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  10. 10/390 • March 30, 2010 at 3:07 am • Reply

    group of 6 what should we doooo?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 3:21 am • Reply

      A remote chance that one of the Ruggles six-person suites is still available, in which case consider yourselves lucky. Otherwise, you’ll have to split up, but your number’s probably good enough that if you drop to General Selection you can all get Furnald singles. If you’d rather stay in pairs, you’ll have your choice of doubles together on a floor of several different buildings.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • 10/390 • March 30, 2010 at 7:11 pm •

        Thank you!!!

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • furnald soph • March 30, 2010 at 3:35 pm • Reply

      my group of 4 had 380 last year and we barely snuck in…i think only 1 or 2 rooms were left after us. so if you really want singles go for it, but be careful!

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  11. new fan • March 30, 2010 at 3:16 am • Reply

    I just bookmarked the spectrum.
    I wonder if this is a sign of change… will I check this more than the bwog? we’ll see but so far a lot of the info here has been more interesting.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Jhon • September 3, 2012 at 12:21 am • Reply

      Android is new and perfection is not ecpexted 2) 200000 products per day means that more people prefer the product and thus software developers and other services will turn to it. Same happened with Microsoft VS apple when Microsoft clearly won. 3) Linux is mass market ready however other operating systems already have the largest piece of the pie (read 2). plus there is no advertising 4) because you love iphone doesn’t mean that the rest of us can’t love android BMX Bunny Hop

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  12. Anonymous • March 30, 2010 at 3:20 am • Reply

    20/2855. Maybe if I’m lucky, I’ll get to live in the same Wien single two years in a row?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 11:14 am • Reply

      If you are lucky, you can do better, perhaps… Schapiro? You’ll have to wait to see how many of your classmates drop to General Selection and eat up singles ahead of you.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Juan • September 3, 2012 at 12:57 am • Reply

      About 1 week ago only on QVC though it was $199.99 but it’s now $235 but they’re sold out! I am trniyg root it also. PD has some stuff I have never seen on this phone unlike the two 7 PDN turned into Tablet Hybrid this one Full Tablet with the e-Reader not active until you access it. This frees up memory. Very quick full 800MHz / 800MHz there is more info on tipstir.the-talk.net shown in the video.

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  13. this... • March 30, 2010 at 4:10 am • Reply

    is amazing. thank you spectrum!!!!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  14. spectrums got • March 30, 2010 at 9:39 am • Reply

    skillzzzzzzzz

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Spectrum Slammer • March 30, 2010 at 9:45 am • Reply

      wrong. Spectrum sucks.

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  15. Ben cotton • March 30, 2010 at 9:42 am • Reply

    Is a housing god

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  16. Spectrum Slammer • March 30, 2010 at 9:44 am • Reply

    if spectrum were a pokemon it would be magikarp – the worst one

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • phil • March 30, 2010 at 8:04 pm • Reply

      yah, but magikarp evolves into gyarados

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Spectrum Slammer • March 30, 2010 at 9:30 pm •

        NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! WHY DO I AWLAYS FORGET THATTTT

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  17. Hey • March 30, 2010 at 9:58 am • Reply

    Blake is (clearly) in SEAS.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 11:06 am • Reply

      Right–I’ve only lived with him the whole year. Fixed–thanks!

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  18. hey ben • March 30, 2010 at 10:20 am • Reply

    any idea what the cutoff will be (preferably after 10/1500 or so?) for the EC 6th floor doubles? do you know if the cutoff last year was influenced by a summer transfer or something like that?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 11:11 am • Reply

      I believe those were actually taken during the lottery last year, but we can check on that. It’s really hard to tell where they’ll go because there’s only a few of them–as they’re isolated from the rest of the building, I think they’re ones to avoid for a lot of people. Probably a group of friends trying to get doubles together somewhere along the line–I’d guess it’d be after 10/1500, but I wouldn’t make guarantees, since some of the other doubles that used to be more desirable (in McBain, for example), may no longer be so.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  19. concerned junior • March 30, 2010 at 11:36 am • Reply

    Does every 5 person group with point value 26.67 have to be EC Exclusion, because there’s no other way you can get that point value with 5 people not going EC Exclusion? Does this matter?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 4:19 pm • Reply

      Yes–every 26.67-point group is ECX. We have the ECX list now from Housing–we’ll have a write-up a little bit later. The cutoff will depend on the number of 30-point groups that are ECX and the number of seniors that take those either as a standard group of five or during Senior Regroup, but if you’re an ECX group with a point value LESS than 26.67, I’d say your chances of getting one aren’t good.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  20. General Selection • March 30, 2010 at 1:49 pm • Reply

    Will there be any information about it?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 4:21 pm • Reply

      Sure–it’s a little harder because everyone’s a single (unlike here, where the group sizes reveal a lot) and we don’t know how many groups will drop down during the Suite Selection process, but we’ll give it a shot.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  21. CC'11 • March 30, 2010 at 2:58 pm • Reply

    Thanks Spectrum! Super helpful :)

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  22. ben cotton • March 30, 2010 at 3:28 pm • Reply

    be layin down the KNOWLEDGE

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Nicole • February 29, 2012 at 12:18 am • Reply

      have you heard about the canpomy national relief? they are based out of new york. what do you think about them? I was planning on having them ask me for debt relief help before I read your articleVA:F [1.9.7_1111]please wait…VA:F [1.9.7_1111](from 0 votes)

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  23. ECX • March 30, 2010 at 7:05 pm • Reply

    which floors in EC are renovated??

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 11:04 pm • Reply

      Not sure–Housing’s site doesn’t list them exactly. We’ll check with them–in the meantime, if anyone who currently lives in EC has a sure answer, let us know.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  24. how likely is it... • March 30, 2010 at 10:07 pm • Reply

    that a 4 person group will select into an RA’s 6 person EC suite, without being friends with the RA and rider? accomplishing both stealing the suite from the RA’s friends and living with a RA who doesn’t want them…

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • question • March 30, 2010 at 10:44 pm • Reply

      i feel like i know you.

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 30, 2010 at 11:06 pm • Reply

      That’s a mystery. Seems like most people wouldn’t WANT to live with an RA they didn’t know already, but who knows–Senior Regroup could bring desperation or frustration that causes that to change.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • The Voice of Reason • March 31, 2010 at 12:43 am •

        anybody who risks picking into an RA suite is just inviting drama in. especially if they don’t know who the RA is ahead of time.

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • beware blind RA EC suite • March 31, 2010 at 1:06 am •

        picked blind into a RA EC suite with 3 buddies. worst decision ever, senior yr has been terrible, totally defeats purpose of the EC suite b/c the RA doesn’t throw parties, studies in room, is a stickler for common area, and makes us have weekly meetings to discuss our suite spirit (WTF).

        basically, think about who becomes an RA and then think twice about picking blind into an EC suite. i had a better situation as a sophomore in claremont than this misery.

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Surendra • September 1, 2012 at 1:28 am • Reply

      Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be rnuinng off the screen in Ie. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The layout look great though! Hope you get the problem solved soon. Cheers

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  25. Thank you • March 31, 2010 at 12:04 am • Reply

    Ben Cotton and Spectrum! You rock! you’re really starting to outdo Bwog!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  26. chances • March 31, 2010 at 3:21 pm • Reply

    of a 20/2301-General Selection getting any Broadway single?
    cutoff history says definitely yes for some years and definitely not for others

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • March 31, 2010 at 6:09 pm • Reply

      The cutoff history for singles can be tough to figure across the board, yes. I’d say it’s unlikely.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  27. Watt Studio Doubles • April 1, 2010 at 1:26 am • Reply

    Any idea where these will slip to? Do sophomores have a shot?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • April 1, 2010 at 3:15 am • Reply

      Probably not. Two years ago a few did slip down, but last year junior groups near the end of the 20-point round snapped up the last ones. With class size increases and renovations, the trend is that specific housing options get tougher, not easier, so I wouldn’t get your hopes up. If you have a fantastic 10-point number, cross your fingers.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  28. Furnald Doubles • April 2, 2010 at 12:25 pm • Reply

    Any idea which rooms are available to sophomores?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • April 3, 2010 at 7:52 pm • Reply

      The last couple of years you’d have been fine with anything better than 10/2000, but it’s hard to be sure because there aren’t many of them, so if just a few groups ahead of you decided they wanted them, you might miss out. Probably chances good, though (depending on your number, of course…)

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Which rooms? • April 3, 2010 at 10:30 pm •

        Do you know specifically which rooms are open to sophomores? I’m part of a group of 8 that will be splitting up and I want to know if we can be near each other.

        (BTW, thanks for the great work Ben!!)

        VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • Ben Cotton STAFF • April 5, 2010 at 7:10 pm •

        Sorry–missed this one. They’re in lines, so one on top of the other, a few per floor, rather than all clustered together. Check out the floor plans.

        http://www.columbia.edu/cu/housing/docs/residence-halls/furnald/index.html

        VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  29. 10/272 • April 3, 2010 at 6:46 pm • Reply

    7 person group- chance of a single in Broadway or Furnald if we break up?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • April 3, 2010 at 8:37 pm • Reply

      Almost definitely no chance for Broadway–juniors take those.

      As for Furnald, first instinct is to say you should get them no problem, but looking at the list, with five other 10-point groups of 7 ahead of you and none of them likely to get Claremont, you might not if they all do the same. So monitor what those groups do when it’s their turn to pick–we’ll be watching that closely once we get to that point.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Nisanur • February 27, 2012 at 7:51 am • Reply

      this is what i thhugat randall said when i was like 7randall :i dont see a new door in my station in 5 (fliped me off with three fingers)seconds i will pirsonaly put u threw the sweater me: ahhhgVA:F [1.9.11_1134]please wait…VA:F [1.9.11_1134](from 0 votes)

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  30. barnard • April 6, 2010 at 8:12 pm • Reply

    What do you know about the Barnard cap and how soon it will probably be reached this year?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Ben Cotton STAFF • April 6, 2010 at 9:49 pm • Reply

      It’s usually 50 students–we don’t have any information on when that’s been hit in past years, but we’ll try to get an idea tomorrow.

      VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  31. 10/735 • April 7, 2010 at 10:38 pm • Reply

    so if i dropped to general selection, do you think a wien single would be possible or would it def be a blind double :/ thank you so much, this series has been incredibly helpful!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  32. Fidelia • May 27, 2012 at 10:51 pm • Reply

    Since the admin of this website is working,
    no question very shortly it will be well-known, due to its
    feature contents.
    My webpage :: new york search engine marketing

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Zuleica • September 3, 2012 at 1:48 am • Reply

      Hi BrendanI have two questions for you.I’ve just had my first cieamrcoml casting and was wondering how long it takes casting directors , directors and their clients to decide whether or not they want a particular actor?I’ve applied for a number of cieamrcomls and other tv work on Spotlight and not heard anything; as I have heard how important it is to have a showreel on there ( which I don’t yet have) I’ve put a few clips on CCP which I sometimes give people the link to. Is this the right thing to do? I’m a bit worried it might do more harm than good.best wishesHazel Bawden

      VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Comment



Be nice. Don't use HTML tags. And consider reading our full comment policy.